W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-notification@w3.org > February 2011

Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Notification drafts

From: John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:27:24 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikxqdvuCsAJYVO4sCpUM9Gvm7SCCz5n2PA+2wSF@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Web Notification WG <public-web-notification@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:57:55 +0100, John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I updated the first spec ("Web Notifications" [1]), with the following
>> significant changes:
>>  - constructor model for creating new notifications, i.e.:
>>       new Notification("mail.png", "New Mail") rather than
>> NotificationCenter.createNotification("mail.png", "New Mail")
>>  - exceptions no longer thrown from Notification.show() -- error callback
>> is
>> invoked instead
>>  - changes to make the spec more consistent with HTML5 regarding
>> directionality and event model
>>  - fixed up examples to be consistent with the new structure
>>
>> I'm continuing to work on the "Web URL Notifications" spec.
>>
>> [1]
>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/publish/Notifications.html
>>
>
> Would it be possible that instead of several documents we could have one
> document describing Notifications and one document describing URL
> Notifications, including their respective use cases? That would make it
> easier to get the specification published I think. As now everything is
> intertwined and there is no real agreement yet about URL Notifications. The
> URL Notifications draft specification could obviously build on the
> Notifications specification.
>
> It would be great to have a first WD out shortly.


I'm fine with making that change.

 -John
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 18:27:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 17 December 2012 14:48:28 GMT