- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:51:16 +0000
- To: <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, <gbillock@google.com>, <jhawkins@chromium.org>, <public-web-intents@w3.org>
I think if James could put his written notes in an email that would be an excellent summary of specific changes/points. In addition, at the end of the meeting we plan to review what we've done, so that should help. These two things plus our detailed minutes should give a good review. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Mar 21, 2012, at 11:24 PM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: > On Mar 21, 2012, at 22:12 , Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Hi All - since it appears that some of the folks interested in Web Intents were unable to attend this week's f2f meeting, I think it would be useful if someone that attended the meeting would provide a short summary of the related discussions (e.g. hot issues, important agreements, next steps, etc.). >> >> Would someone please do that? (I noticed the raw minutes are at [Mar-20] and [Mar-21]). > > I think that that would be a great idea, I'm unsure how to proceed to make it simple (and not too much extra work). I know that both James and Greg wrote down a lot of the things they were going to do — do you guys have that in electronic form? It could make for a good skeleton onto which we could then tack some extra details where needed. > > We should probably also write down the brainstorming from the restaurant about the type attribute, using URIs rather than media types, dropping the encoding attribute, passing blobs/URIs, etc. (but not now, now is time for sleep — I only say this not to forget tomorrow :). > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 23:51:52 UTC