- From: Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:19:58 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>
Hi Robin On 20/6/12 14:13 , Robin Berjon wrote: > From a Web architecture point of view, it has long been the accepted > wisdom that how a UA is split does not matter in the least. JCD: That is quite a sweeping argument. It sounds like it is OK to be blind to what happens inside the UA :o) I think I gave the argument that the way the spec is written encourages browser lock-in, if only by obfuscation. I am very uneasy with the browser having sole control over intents and how they are processed. I would rather have the intents processed in another (more open) layer than the browser Of course it make the spec a bit more complex to describe a separable process, but the extra freedom is worth the extra complexity. Best regards JC -- JC Dufourd Directeur d'Etudes/Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Traitement du Signal et Images/Signal and Image Processing Telecom ParisTech, 37-39 rue Dareau, 75014 Paris, France Tel: +33145817733 - Mob: +33677843843 - Fax: +33145817144
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 14:20:21 UTC