W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-intents@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Face to face with DAP?

From: Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:55:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAxVY9fG=FgzD+4RQimJYE=xDs38GXJmHA7GE1NxZF0WsrX6Pg@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Hawkins <jhawkins@chromium.org>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, WebIntents <public-web-intents@w3.org>
I have a pre-existing commitment at that time, but I do agree it would
be great to have more in-person discussions.

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:22 AM, James Hawkins <jhawkins@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 26, 2012, at 16:14 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> > On 4/26/12 7:45 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
>> >> the DAP WG is having a face to face meeting on 10-12/07. The exact
>> >> location is currently unknown, but we should find out fast. So far potential
>> >> (but unconfirmed) locations are near Boston, in Dusseldorf, or (very
>> >> tentatively) in Oslo.
>> >>
>> >> Would people here like to have an Intents TF meeting as part of that
>> >> face to face? If so you're certainly welcome, and we can sort out the exact
>> >> details.
>> >
>> > If Web Intents isn't a major topic on DAP's f2f agenda, would there be a
>> > critical mass of other high priority topics to substantiate an international
>> > f2f meeting in July (especially if DAP is going to meet during TPAC)?
>>
>> I'm not sure that this is a topic for the Intents TF, but yes, there would
>> be. DAP has a host of APIs to define, and while many of these use Intents,
>> they are worked on independently. By the next f2f I expect there to be
>> drafts as well as early implementations of several of those.
>>
>
> I'll let Greg speak for himself, but I'd make the trip.  With Ian's recent
> reply to the Intents proposal on WhatWG, we have a lot of details we need to
> cover.  We've also uncovered quite a few new use cases in speaking with
> potential clients, use cases which would require non-trivial changes to the
> API, so hammering out a lot of the details at the F2F like last time would
> be awesome.
>
> James
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 20:56:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 20:56:17 GMT