W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-intents@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Proposal to add <intent> tag to HTML

From: James Hawkins <jhawkins@google.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:05:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAO800SweNTwvJyA4EXbr_YrUBzNwEe=OjUHBzFtUTOOj_M=Tfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Cc: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>, WebIntents <public-web-intents@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
> On 12/6/11 11:36 AM, James Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> Since the current proposal requires the addition of an HTML tag, the
>> proper place to discuss that addition is WhatWG; my intent was to have
>> that part of the discussion happening orthogonaly to discussions about
>> the rest of the API.  If we have general approval in WhatWG, that's
>> one less thing we need to take care of at a later point in time.  If
>> the members of this task force decide to take another route for
>> registration, at least the discussion on WhatWG will at least be
>> informative.
>
>
> Isn't the "proper" place the public-html, public-html-a11y or associated
> lists?
> I've found to be the WhatWG a worth-while place to discuss, but its
> member-base is limited.
>
> There are many parties that use w3c lists and are not monitoring the whatwg
> list.
>
> I suggest taking the discussion to multiple lists.
>
> As you are aware, you're looking at strong push-back to simply use <meta> or
> <link rel> semantics.
>

I posted on public-html yesterday, but it's still going through moderation.

James
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 21:06:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 6 December 2011 21:06:26 GMT