- From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:11:04 -0500
- To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- Cc: public-web-http-desc@w3.org, "Jurgielewicz, Mariusz" <Mariusz.Jurgielewicz@xerox.com>
On Feb 27, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Klotz, Leigh wrote: > > 2. What the spec says > > Not seeing much discussion on this list about namespaces or xmlns, I > consulted the WADL paper to see how to express no-namespace @element > values. > > The wadl20090202 WADL paper says that representation/element is > defined > as follows: > For XML-based representations, specifies the qualified name of the > root > element as described within the grammars section - see section 2.3. > > It seems like a good idea to be more precise here. > Would it be sufficient to say that if the value of representation/ @element does not contain a prefix then the element is in no namespace ? Marc.
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2009 19:11:49 UTC