W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-http-desc@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Service description value for hypermedia?

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:06:04 -0400
To: Jan Algermissen <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>
Cc: public-web-http-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050617130604.GU20401@markbaker.ca>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Jan Algermissen wrote:
> Actually, I thought you meant that people would generally create such  
> libraries for each *MIME type* (or schema),

Yes, that's what I meant, a library per media type, not one for each
eBay or Google service.  This would mean that for a very general media
type like Atom, that most developers should be content to have a URI,
HTTP, and Atom library in hand.  Having more specific, possibly
per-service libraries on top (even code-generated ones) may have some
value in some cases, but as I mentioned before, I wouldn't want them to
step on the toes of the URI/HTTP/Atom libs by defining things which
were already handled in those libs... like operations, for instance.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.          http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies   http://www.coactus.com
Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 13:05:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:11 GMT