- From: Vickers, Mark <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:15:30 +0000
- To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Cc: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, public-web-and-tv <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
I agree with Giuseppe's direction below. I'd also note that while much of the Media API TF overlaps with the old HNTF, some topics like the downloading & recording are orthogonal to home networking. I suggest we split the final recommendations into at least two documents: 1. a large set of HN recommendations and 2. a smaller recommendation on downloading/recording. For one reason, there're each likely to end up in different WGs. Thanks, mav On Sep 19, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote: > I'm wondering if updating the HNReq document or re-discussing it it's > the best use of our time. I agree we have partially repeated the same > discussion (and I've mentioned this several times) and this is due to > the fact that people active in the group have changed since then > > Anyway, I think is OK to let the HNReq stay as it is (RIP if you wish > ;) ), an focus on quickly wrap up our list of use cases and > requirements, and (more important) on the gap analysis, to see which > requirements have already a spec that can cover them (either final or > WiP). > > During this activity, we should review the NSD spec (see related > discussion on this list) that was the direct consequence of the HNReq > document. > > /g > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Olivier Thereaux > <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: >> Dear Media APIs TF members, >> >> Since we started our work in the Media APIs TF, I have been rather worried >> that we may be reinventing the wheel - or more accurately, that we were >> not most efficient in building upon the two years of work by the Home >> Networking TF in 2011 (and 2012?). >> >> I have started a wiki document to track the similarities and differences >> between the requirements we are currently working on >> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Requirements) and the >> requirements published at the end of 2011 >> (http://www.w3.org/TR/hnreq/#prevent-leaking-of-information) >> >> The document is here, and obviously work in progress: >> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/HNReq_Comparison >> >> >> I am still in the process of analysing the similarities between our TF's >> current list of requirements and the ones published 2 years ago, but the >> similarities are striking. >> >> I would like the TF to discuss and decide the most effective way forward: >> >> 1. Continue with our current list of use cases and requirements, making >> sure we take into account the work already done by the HNTF. >> >> 2. "take over" the HNReq note. This would probably imply changing its name >> (our current scope is often wider the home network) and merging use cases >> and requirements into a single list on which we would subsequently iterate >> >> Many thanks, >> Olivier >> >> >> >> ----------------------------- >> http://www.bbc.co.uk >> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and >> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. >> If you have received it in >> error, please delete it from your system. >> Do not use, copy or disclose the >> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender >> immediately. >> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails >> sent or received. >> Further communication will signify your consent to >> this. >> ----------------------------- >
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 08:16:30 UTC