W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [tt] minutes - 21 May 2013

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 14:25:19 +1000
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2koRNuguE5-nfMqLUWm8ZzrwkkYaDWJH65827yPBrzVxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Vickers, Mark" <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>
Cc: "Glenn A. Adams" <glenn@skynav.com>, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>, W3C Web and TV <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Hi Mark,

I am very grateful for the meeting minutes - they are the only way for
me to stay across what is happening in the meetings.

So: thanks!

Cheers,
Silvia.

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Vickers, Mark
<Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
>
> On May 27, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
>> > <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
>> >> > <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > available at:
>> >> >> >  http://www.w3.org/2013/05/21-webtv-minutes.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > also as text below.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks a lot for taking these minutes, Mark Vickers!
>
>
> ...
>
>> >> >> >ah, i see you are commenting on the recorded minutes; i hadn't
>> >> >> > actually looked at those until you now cite them; i do recall saying that in
>> >> >> > the use of SMIL, TTML had structural timing that wasn't in VTT (as far as
>> >> >> > I'm aware); i don't recall saying the goals of TTML were broader though, so
>> >> >> > that may have been an incorrect paraphrase by the note taker;
>
>
>>
>> and later
>>
>> "glenn: I like "Ensure maximal semantic interop"
>
>
> I do remember saying this in response to a proposal by someone who said this
> but without using the word "semantic"
>
>>
>>    ... right now I beliebe WebVTT is a subset of TTML, as far as
>>    I'm aware.
>
>
> I don't recall saying this.
>
>>
>>    ... for example TTML ability to specifiy feature priority
>
>
> I know I didn't say this, since there is no such thing as "specify feature
> priority" in TTML.
>
>>
>>    ... if WebVTT is kept as a subset of TTML, that would maximize
>>    interop
>> "
>
>
> Whether I said this or not, it is true.  However, whether it is (currently)
> a semantic subset or whether it is desirable to make it so is an open
> question in my mind.
>
>
> Mea culpa. I was the scribe and I apparently did a lousy job. I recall that
> I was well behind the discussion and summarizing from memory while also
> participating in the discussion. I know I left out many good statements from
> people in addition to clearly misstating some I did include.
>
> I really apologize if this has caused increased discord amongst the timed
> text experts. I am personally very much in favor of having both timed text
> efforts in a single group. I think it's important to have more direct
> discussion between the experts, including Glenn and Silvia.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark Vickers
>
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 04:26:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:09 UTC