W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [metadata] New Content Metadata and Synchronization Task Force

From: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:37:03 +0000
To: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3BD9AF75-D9FB-4B62-80DC-4127A2B8ACA1@bbc.co.uk>
´╗┐Hello Daniel,

On 27 Nov 2012, at 01:23, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> As I mentioned at the previous f2f, this metadata tf is able to refer to the relevant wg as http://www.w3.org/2008/01/media-annotations-wg.html.
> 
> Over 3 years, we researched on the metadata issues widely.

I see that the group worked on a use cases and requirements document. Do you think any of it would be reusable in our current context?

I have added a section on media metadata formats/vocabs and am listing the ones mentioned in this thread so far. 

http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Metadata#Metadata_Formats_.2F_Vocabularies

I think it would be good to look at them through the filter of what scenarios such metadata information would enable.

-- 
Olivier

-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and 
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in 
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the 
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender 
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails 
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to 
this.
-----------------------------

attached mail follows:


Hello Daniel,

On 27 Nov 2012, at 01:23, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> As I mentioned at the previous f2f, this metadata tf is able to refer to the relevant wg as http://www.w3.org/2008/01/media-annotations-wg.html.
> 
> Over 3 years, we researched on the metadata issues widely.

I see that the group worked on a use cases and requirements document. Do you think any of it would be reusable in our current context?

I have added a section on media metadata formats/vocabs and am listing the ones mentioned in this thread so far. 

http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Metadata#Metadata_Formats_.2F_Vocabularies

I think it would be good to look at them through the filter of what scenarios such metadata information would enable.

-- 
Olivier


Received on Monday, 10 December 2012 16:37:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:08 UTC