W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [W3C Web and TV IG] Adaptive streaming MPEG DASH liaison

From: Gerard Fernando <gerardmxf@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:33:21 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <41000.26133.qm@web24007.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
To: Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org>, Thomas Stockhammer <stockhammer@nomor.de>
Cc: Rob Glidden <rob.glidden@sbcglobal.net>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "Ali C. Begen \(abegen\)" <abegen@cisco.com>, "juhani.huttunen@nokia.com" <juhani.huttunen@nokia.com>, "hj08.lee@lge.com" <hj08.lee@lge.com>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>, Gerard Fernando <gerardmxf@yahoo.co.uk>
W3C should be looking at the complete stack being RF: 
(a) Audio codec
(b) Video codec
(c) Transport/container format
(d) DASH 

However, it doesn't mean that one SDO needs to work on all of these. There is an 
audio codec effort  in IETF. An RF video codec effort is beginning in MPEG. An 
RF transport/container format (either profile or standard) is needed. An RF 
profile of DASH would then refer to each of the above.  


Best regards

Gerard




________________________________
From: Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org>
To: Thomas Stockhammer <stockhammer@nomor.de>
Cc: Rob Glidden <rob.glidden@sbcglobal.net>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; 
Ali C. Begen (abegen) <abegen@cisco.com>; Gerard Fernando 
<gerardmxf@yahoo.co.uk>; "juhani.huttunen@nokia.com" 
<juhani.huttunen@nokia.com>; "hj08.lee@lge.com" <hj08.lee@lge.com>; 
"public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Sent: Sat, 19 March, 2011 3:00:40
Subject: Re: [W3C Web and TV IG] Adaptive streaming MPEG DASH liaison

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Thomas Stockhammer
<stockhammer@nomor.de> wrote:
> Rob,
> DASH is one component in a streaming system. You also have codecs and other
> components. And streaming means delivery over a network. You need to make
> sure that ALL components fulfill your policy according to your rules and if
> you do this, you may be down to something that does not work or has
> completely unreasonable functionalities.
> This does not at all say that DASH is encumbered, but it says that removing
> technologies from an end-to-end system is most likely not the appropriate
> way forward.

I agree. But in this case that means the W3C should be looking not
only for an adaptive streaming standard that is royalty free, but also
the whole rest of the stack as well. Otherwise the network part alone
is useless as a W3C recommendation/standard.

I suppose DASH profiles will specify the codecs/containers for one
particular use case ? So I assume a royalty free DASH profile should
also include codecs/containers.

-- 
Steve Lhomme
Matroska association Chairman
Received on Saturday, 19 March 2011 10:33:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:02 UTC