W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Interpretation of "web page" in software context

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:47:32 +0200
To: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org
Message-id: <C188F631-1461-47F1-9C1C-3CF144578EE0@trace.wisc.edu>
might the answer be found by exploring why 'interaction context' doesn’t seem to work?

a good place to start might be in finding out what the problems we have are - and then finding a way to address them.

Can someone or someones summarize the problems with interaction context? 

Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Director Trace R&D Center
Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering
and Biomedical Engineering
University of Wisconsin-Madison

Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International
and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project
http://Raisingthefloor.org   ---   http://GPII.net

On Jun 18, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Andi Snow-Weaver wrote:

> We're quickly coming to the point in our work where we will not be able to reach consensus on the guidance for the success criteria until we come to consensus on interpretation of "web page" and "set of web pages" in the software context.
> The proposal to use "interaction context" for "web page" has not yet been accepted. 
> We need another proposal. Ideas anyone?
> Andi
Received on Monday, 18 June 2012 14:48:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:43 UTC