W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > February 2007

RE: 1169 ready for Team C review

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:19:48 -0600
To: "'Sofia Celic'" <Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org>, "'Andi Snow-Weaver'" <andisnow@us.ibm.com>, <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009601c753ed$f7321e80$0f6fa8c0@NC84301>

It would be required to restart everything else but not decorative.
Its hard to figure out how to do that without getting complicated.

Stop all. Restart all non-decorative.   (any 3 second exception here?)


Gregg
 -- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sofia Celic
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:05 AM
> To: Andi Snow-Weaver; public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
> Subject: RE: 1169 ready for Team C review
>
>
>
> I'm not sure about this one. If " it is not required to
> provide a mechanism to restart the movement to conform to
> this Success Criterion "
> then we shouldn't use a word that suggests this requirement in the SC.
>
> How about we say something like:
> "Content can be stopped, and restarted as necessary, by the
> user unless the timing or movement is part of an activity
> where timing or movement is essential"
>
> Sofia
>
> ____________________________
>
> Dr Sofia Celic
> Assistant Manager Online Accessibility
> & Senior Web Accessibility Consultant
> Vision Australia - Accessible Information Solutions
> 454 Glenferrie Road
> Kooyong, Victoria, 3144
> P: +61 (0)3 9864 9284
> F: +61 (0)3 9864 9370
> E-mail: Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org.au
> www.visionaustralia.org.au
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andi
> Snow-Weaver
> Sent: Saturday, 17 February 2007 7:23 AM
> To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
> Subject: 1169 ready for Team C review
>
>
>
> Per my action item yesterday, I have modified 1169. The
> agenda section on the Team C page doesn't look current so I'm
> not sure what process you guys are using now. But we should
> discuss this one on Monday.
>
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_indivi
> dual.php?i
> d=1169
>
> Andi
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> << ella for Spam Control >> has removed 492 Spam messages and
> set aside
> 207 Later for me
> You can use it too - and it's FREE!  www.ellaforspam.com
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 06:20:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:49 GMT