W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > September 2005

Draft - Guide to Guideline 3.1 Level 3 Success Criteria 2

From: <Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:08:50 -0400
To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF153C8711.8585DFE7-ON8525708A.004D1F29-8525708A.004DC9C6@notesdev.ibm.com>
Attached is a draft guide for GL 3.1 L3 SC2, A mechanism is available for 
identifying specific definitions of words used in an unusual or restricted 
way, 
including idioms and jargon [1].

I'm not completely sure what the sufficient techniques are. At the 
September 21, 2005, Team B meeting we determined that internal linking OR 
a glossary link were sufficient. But, what about an on line dictionary 
reference or dictionary cascade?  And, is an HTML definition list 
sufficient?  Currently I have marked any of these as sufficient.   I also 
modified example 2 because originally both examples were related to 
dictionary cascades.   Most of the material was pulled from the existsing 
Guide for this success criterion [2]. 



[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#meaning-idioms
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-GENERAL/meaning-idioms.html

Becky Gibson
Web Accessibility Architect
                                                       
IBM Emerging Internet Technologies
5 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
Voice: 978 399-6101; t/l 333-6101
Email: gibsonb@us.ibm.com


Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 14:10:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:42 GMT