W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [for review] RD Symposia design

From: Liam McGee <liam@searchjohnston.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:44:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAC0tDOp0ooCprqi1a9-m5n6DA+dEgdwiPbY3i+hPkAujHbVoSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Cc: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Just as a caveat, I had not added aria, skiplinks or other necessary
additives to the html, it is very much a rough draft. Unless Shawn tidied
up behind me, which she has already done to some extent (thanks Shawn!)

The font - all in all not bad but kerning on cap A and Cap W seems
diabolical. the choice of open web fonts is sadly somewhat limited, unless
anyone knows any brilliant and expert digital font designers who might
tweak them?

Justified text - very interesting. not sure how well browsers are at full
justification yet, but I agree that it could look pretty good at full
line-width. Could then change to ragged-right as line-length decreased to
avoid horribleness on small screens, responsive-style.

Is the yellow box giving the bibtext too much prominence? I am also seeing
the box stopping short in Aurora (firefox 15)

Transcript - very good point. Needs some navigation handles... how are the
transcripts generated? Any chance agenda items can be marked up? Or mark-up
the speaker's name?

Shawn do you want me to fold in comments to create a new version or do they
need to be discussed first?

L.

On 3 July 2012 20:52, Yeliz Yesilada <yyeliz@metu.edu.tr> wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> As I said in my previous email, I really like the design. Please see some
> minor comments below:
>
> On 2 Jul 2012, at 16:41, Shawn Henry wrote:
>
> > Please let me know if you have any concerns with the overall design, and
> if you have comments on any specifics, e.g,:
> > * Is the use of all caps and italics acceptable?
>
> I think they look good.
>
> > * Should there be a visited link colour?
>
> I think this would be useful, especially reading long research pages, this
> could be useful.
>
> and some other comments for editors discretion:
> - I think justified text would be useful as well (both left and right).
> - link to slides in the proceedings tab might not be available in all
> symposiums.
> - Links at the top (WAI R&D Symposia » Metrics Symposium Home ») are used
> as breadcrumbs but as I move along the tab, the tab items are not added to
> this list, so this might be a bit confusing.
> - Will the transcript page include some mechanism of highlighting, for
> example time stamps, or some headings, etc? This would be useful to guide
> people reading the transcript page, otherwise it might be too long. This
> page could also include agenda of the symposium to guide the reader so they
> would be able to jump to specific agenda items. Based on this, I wonder if
> the following symposiums can be recorded so that we also provide audio
> transcripts for people to follow.
> - I guess the link at the bottom of the page will be removed: <
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/rd/cfp.html>.
> - In my browser (Firefox v13.01), yellow box is not fully covering the
> bibtex item <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/rd/report.html>.
>
> and some minor comments about the content.
> - I think it would be good to add affiliations of the scientific committee
> members to this page:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/rd/home.html
>
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 07:54:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 5 July 2012 07:54:09 GMT