W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > February 2012

Re: suggestion for "Copyright Policy" section

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:41:20 +0100
Message-ID: <4F45FBB0.60801@w3.org>
To: simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk
CC: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Hi Simon,

On 23.2.2012 09:30, Simon Harper wrote:
> Great one Giorgio,
>
> I like the second version best.
>
> But to attract quality submissions, a proceedings like w3cNote has more
> 'value' I think than an entry on a web page - otherwise, why are we
> creating a w3c note as opposed to just adding the text we are creating
> as an entry on the site?
>
> I might, as a compromise, be OK with having the note and a list of
> referenced papers in the format you suggest, somewhere prominent in that
> note.
>
> Shadi / Shawn - will Google index, in Scholar, the Note and the seminar
> site with the papers in it?

It seems to reference the entire site, regardless of Note or not:
  - 
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=website+accessibility+metrics+site%3Aw3.org&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=&as_vis=0>


Best,
   Shadi


> Si.
>
> PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster
> response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line.
>
> =======================
> Simon Harper
> http://simon.harper.name/about/card/
>
> University of Manchester (UK)
> Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group
> http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk
>
>
> On 23/02/12 08:17, giorgio brajnik wrote:
>> Why don't we try as an exercise to write some example of references?
>>
>> How would you refer to the research note[1]?
>> and how to the paper by Nietzio et al[2]?
>>
>> My suggestion is something like
>>
>> [1] M. Vigo, G. Brajnik and J. O'Connor, Research note on Web
>> Accessibility Metrics, 2012. In Website Accessibility Metrics, Online
>> Symposium 5 December 2011, http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics (and
>> the URL of the research note itself)
>>
>> [2] A Niezio, M Eibegger, M. Goodwin, M Snaprud, Towards a score
>> function for WCAG 2.0 benchmarking, 2011. In Website Accessibility
>> Metrics, Online Symposium 5 December 2011,
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics (and link to
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/paper11)
>>
>> or, alternatively:
>>
>> [2] A Niezio, M Eibegger, M. Goodwin, M Snaprud, Towards a score
>> function for WCAG 2.0 benchmarking, 2011. In Proc. of Website
>> Accessibility Metrics, Online Symposium 5 December 2011, Vigo,
>> Brajnik, O'Connor (eds.), http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics (and
>> link to http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/paper11)
>>
>>
>> The reason for having the note is to provide context and some
>> interpretation of results.
>>
>> Giorgio
>>
>>
>> On 02/23/2012 08:47 AM, Simon Harper wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> So for me I feel that if we accept a paper we should include it -
>>> otherwise we should not accept it. Further, the argument that
>>> publications included as part of the site, ie on the web are as citable
>>> as the note - just doesn't hold up. I see the note as the proceedings of
>>> the seminar. In this case we could have 2 sections the first being by
>>> the editors, the second being each paper - referenced as a proceedings.
>>> If the site has the same status as the note then why do we have a note
>>> at all?
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Si.
>>>
>>> PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster
>>> response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line.
>>>
>>> =======================
>>> Simon Harper
>>> http://simon.harper.name/about/card/
>>>
>>> University of Manchester (UK)
>>> Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group
>>> http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22/02/12 22:31, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>>>> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Talk:Mobile_Pre_CFP>
>>>>
>>>> Instead of: "Accepted papers will be published - in attributable form
>>>> - as part of the proceedings and in the ensuing publication, which
>>>> will be published using the W3C Document License."
>>>>
>>>> Consider: "Accepted papers will be published as part of the
>>>> proceedings. Accepted papers may also be referenced or included (in
>>>> full or in part) in attributable form in the ensuing publication,
>>>> which will be published using the W3C Document License."
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Shadi
>>>>
>>>
>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 08:41:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 February 2012 08:41:52 GMT