W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > February 2012

Re: suggestion for "Copyright Policy" section

From: giorgio brajnik <brajnik@uniud.it>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:22:31 +0100
Message-ID: <4F45F747.2060105@uniud.it>
To: simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk
CC: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
I agree with Simon 100%. I think we need to decide which conceptual 
"container" to use for the papers and the RN.


   Giorgio

On 02/23/2012 09:20 AM, Simon Harper wrote:
> Hi Shadi,
>
> ...and I disagree. If we accept a paper we are agreeing to its
> publication (as far as I'm concerned) otherwise we should not accept it,
> and if we are not able to get enough good quality papers for a specific
> seminar then maybe that says something about the topic of that seminar.
>
> Cheers
>
> Si.
>
> PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster
> response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line.
>
> =======================
> Simon Harper
> http://simon.harper.name/about/card/
>
> University of Manchester (UK)
> Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group
> http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk
>
>
> On 23/02/12 08:13, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> I do not think that we should have a precondition that obligates us to
>> fully include all the papers in the consolidated note, for a number of
>> reasons. I think that the editors with the group should be flexible in
>> making such a decision depending on how the symposium pans out.
>>
>> Best,
>> Shadi
>>
>>
>> On 23.2.2012 08:47, Simon Harper wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> So for me I feel that if we accept a paper we should include it -
>>> otherwise we should not accept it. Further, the argument that
>>> publications included as part of the site, ie on the web are as citable
>>> as the note - just doesn't hold up. I see the note as the proceedings of
>>> the seminar. In this case we could have 2 sections the first being by
>>> the editors, the second being each paper - referenced as a proceedings.
>>> If the site has the same status as the note then why do we have a note
>>> at all?
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Si.
>>>
>>> PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster
>>> response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line.
>>>
>>> =======================
>>> Simon Harper
>>> http://simon.harper.name/about/card/
>>>
>>> University of Manchester (UK)
>>> Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group
>>> http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22/02/12 22:31, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>>>> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Talk:Mobile_Pre_CFP>
>>>>
>>>> Instead of: "Accepted papers will be published - in attributable form
>>>> - as part of the proceedings and in the ensuing publication, which
>>>> will be published using the W3C Document License."
>>>>
>>>> Consider: "Accepted papers will be published as part of the
>>>> proceedings. Accepted papers may also be referenced or included (in
>>>> full or in part) in attributable form in the ensuing publication,
>>>> which will be published using the W3C Document License."
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Shadi
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 08:23:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 February 2012 08:23:22 GMT