W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > February 2012

Re: suggestion for "Copyright Policy" section

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:13:56 +0100
Message-ID: <4F45F544.4070803@w3.org>
To: simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk
CC: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Hi Simon,

I do not think that we should have a precondition that obligates us to 
fully include all the papers in the consolidated note, for a number of 
reasons. I think that the editors with the group should be flexible in 
making such a decision depending on how the symposium pans out.


On 23.2.2012 08:47, Simon Harper wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> So for me I feel that if we accept a paper we should include it -
> otherwise we should not accept it. Further, the argument that
> publications included as part of the site, ie on the web are as citable
> as the note - just doesn't hold up. I see the note as the proceedings of
> the seminar. In this case we could have 2 sections the first being by
> the editors, the second being each paper - referenced as a proceedings.
> If the site has the same status as the note then why do we have a note
> at all?
> cheers
> Si.
> PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster
> response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line.
> =======================
> Simon Harper
> http://simon.harper.name/about/card/
> University of Manchester (UK)
> Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group
> http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk
> On 22/02/12 22:31, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Talk:Mobile_Pre_CFP>
>> Instead of: "Accepted papers will be published - in attributable form
>> - as part of the proceedings and in the ensuing publication, which
>> will be published using the W3C Document License."
>> Consider: "Accepted papers will be published as part of the
>> proceedings. Accepted papers may also be referenced or included (in
>> full or in part) in attributable form in the ensuing publication,
>> which will be published using the W3C Document License."
>> Thoughts?
>> Best,
>> Shadi

Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 08:14:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:33:42 UTC