- From: Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:47:39 +0000
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- CC: Yeliz Yesilada <yyeliz@metu.edu.tr>, Peter Thiessen <peterdev001@gmail.com>, RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Hi everyone, So for me I feel that if we accept a paper we should include it - otherwise we should not accept it. Further, the argument that publications included as part of the site, ie on the web are as citable as the note - just doesn't hold up. I see the note as the proceedings of the seminar. In this case we could have 2 sections the first being by the editors, the second being each paper - referenced as a proceedings. If the site has the same status as the note then why do we have a note at all? cheers Si. PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line. ======================= Simon Harper http://simon.harper.name/about/card/ University of Manchester (UK) Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk On 22/02/12 22:31, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Talk:Mobile_Pre_CFP> > > Instead of: "Accepted papers will be published - in attributable form > - as part of the proceedings and in the ensuing publication, which > will be published using the W3C Document License." > > Consider: "Accepted papers will be published as part of the > proceedings. Accepted papers may also be referenced or included (in > full or in part) in attributable form in the ensuing publication, > which will be published using the W3C Document License." > > Thoughts? > > Best, > Shadi >
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 07:48:04 UTC