- From: Kiyochika Nakamura <nakamura-kiyochika@mitsue.co.jp>
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:13:47 +0900
- To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Dear Eval TF members, I would like to provide following comments on the Working Draft of WCAG-EM 1.0 on behalf of Working Group 3 of Web Accessibility Infrastructure Committee in Japan. Location: Step 2.c Current text: * Content that are created using different templates (if this is known to the evaluator); * Content that are authored by different people (if this is known to the evaluator); * Content that are created using different coding styles; Comments: We think that it is difficult to identify the types of web pages because these three sentences are ambiguous, Especially, "different coding styles" needs to be more explained here, or defined as a term. Also on step 2.c, are the types of web page and web page states all required to choose as samples? It seems too much pages to evaluate for the large site and a time-consuming step for the evaluators. Suggested Change: Make the word "different" clear, and divide the types of web pages into two categories, such as "required" and "optional". Regards, Kiyochika -- Kiyochika Nakamura (On behalf of Working Group 3 of Web Accessibility Infrastructure Commitee) Mitsue-Links Co., Ltd.
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2014 01:16:52 UTC