Re: EvalTF agenda Telco

Regrets - I'm on holidays the next three thursdays.
Detlev

On 11 Jul 2013, at 01:07, Velleman, Eric wrote:

> Dear Eval TF,
> 
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 11 July 2013 at:
>  * 14:00 to 15:00 UTC
>  * 15:00 to 16:00 UK Time
>  * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
>  * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
>  * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
>  * 22:00 to 23:00 Western Australia Time
>  * 00:00 to 01:00 Eastern Australia Time (Note: Friday)
> 
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
>  - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
> 
> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
>  * +1.617.761.6200
>  * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
> 
> We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
>  * IRC server: irc.w3.org
>  * port: 6665
>  * channel: #eval
> 
> 
> AGENDA:
> 
> #1. Welcome
> 
> #2. Status Use Case revision in section 1.b and in template
> What did we do after last weeks discussion?
> 
> #3. How does the methodology help evaluators decide which states to consider?
> For something like gmail or a shopping account, there is a need to test many different states of a web “page”. How does the methodology help you decide which states to consider? And how and where is this reported
> 
> The states are indirectly addressed in section 2.c Identify the Variety..: "Web pages that change appearance, behavior, and content depending on the user, device, browser, platform, orientation and settings;" and then in step 3.b Include examplar..: "Web pages from distinct types of web pages, as identified per Step 2.c: Identify the Variety of Web Page Types;" but it seems missing in the rest of the document including in the reporting. Mildest way of doing that could be in the latest section "Considerations for Particular Situations" but it can also be included into all the steps.
> 
> #4. Stage and/or Step
> We use stage and step in section “Conformance Evaluation Procedure”. We use “Stage” for the higher level elements (1, 2, 3,..etc.) and “step” for the inner levels (1.a, 1.b, etc.). We have done so in a consistent way. But is the diagram ok? Or should it be “stage” in the graphic instead of “step”?
> 
> #5. Other issues
> Who is planning to go to Shenzen for TPAC?

-- 
Detlev Fischer
testkreis - das Accessibility-Team von feld.wald.wiese
c/o feld.wald.wiese
Thedestraße 2
22767 Hamburg

Tel   +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3
Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84
Fax   +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5

http://www.testkreis.de
Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites

Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 06:35:01 UTC