W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > January 2013

RE: Do we need a definition of random?

From: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:40:05 +0800
To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8AFA77741B11DB47B24131F1E38227A901007237325B@XCHG-MS1.ads.ecu.edu.au>
I really like the idea of asking the evaluator to state how their total sample was chosen, including the random portion.


Regards

Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT, AALIA(cs)
PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
v.conway@ecu.edu.au
v.conway@webkeyit.com
Mob: 0415 383 673

This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
________________________________________
From: Velleman, Eric [evelleman@bartimeus.nl]
Sent: Sunday, 27 January 2013 9:07 AM
To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Subject: Do we need a definition of random?

Dear all,

Things we may want to discuss as input for the next editor draft from reactions in the survey 7 [1]:

2.  ..otherwise we must define "random"
Frederick was so kind to include a few definitions into the survey but I am not sure if we really have to include a definition or explanation of 'random'. There are many ways to select a random sample and I am not sure if we want to put one or more of them into the methodology as it would seem we have a preference.

Part of a possible resolution: No definition or explanation, but we add to the reporting section: "describe how you selected the random sample."

Let me know what you think.
Kindest regards,

Eric

[1] - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130122#step3e>

This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.

CRICOS IPC 00279B
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 13:41:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:16 GMT