W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > January 2013

Re: EvalTF agenda Telco

From: Alistair Garrison <alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:52:03 +0000
Message-Id: <DA4B54EB-B65C-46C1-8A26-CCEAB2DDF5F2@gmail.com>
To: Eric Velleman <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Dear Eval TF, 

I have a meeting conflict this week.  I shall catch up on the list.

Very best regards 

Alistair 

On 30 Jan 2013, at 10:31, Velleman, Eric wrote:

> Dear Eval TF,
> 
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 31 January 2012 at:
>  * 15:00 to 16:00 UTC
>  * 15:00 to 16:00 UK Time
>  * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
>  * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
>  * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
>  * 23:00 to 24:00 Western Australia Time
> 
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
>  - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
> 
> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
>  * +1.617.761.6200
>  * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
> 
> We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
>  * IRC server: irc.w3.org
>  * port: 6665
>  * channel: #eval
> 
> 
> AGENDA:
> 
> #1. Welcome
> 
> #2. New editor draft and DoC:
>  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130128>
>  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20120920>
> 
> View changes here in diff version between 17 January and 28 January version:
> <http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20130117&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-201301228>
> 
> #3. EvalTF Survey 7 and 8 discussion
> - <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/48225/evaltfq8>
> We will discuss open issues from the surveys. I will send around the links just before the meeting. We will include the following:
> 
> #4. Combining evaluations
> How does combining evaluations relate to uniform accessibility support and use of tools and configurations. See discussion on the list:
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2013Jan/0042.html>
> 
> Proposed resolution can be found in:
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2013Jan/0052.html>
> 
> #5. Make sampling optional
> Proposed resolution: Keep it non-optional until we have more backing info that random samples do not add to the results of the structured sample.
> List: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2013Jan/0044.html>
> 
> #6. Definition of random
> Possible resolution: No definition or explanation, but we add to the reporting section: "describe how you selected the random sample."
> List: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2013Jan/0043.html>
> 
> #7. Size of the sample
> There is more research necessary and coming up, but for the moment we should put something here that we can used for testing in the next Public Working Draft.
> 
> Proposed resolution (based on discussion on the list): "Include a random sample of at least 20 percent of the number of web pages that are in the structured sample or a minimum of 5 random web pages from the scope of the website into the sample (if available)."
> List: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2013Jan/0045.html>
> 
> #8. Other issues
> 
> Eric Velleman
> 
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 19:52:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:16 GMT