W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > January 2013

RE: Combining evaluations

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:10:22 -0500
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP560F569B974E53177E1690FE180@phx.gbl>
To: "'Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\)'" <r.scano@webprofession.com>, "'Velleman, Eric'" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
I think requiring evaluators to report their AT testing tools and
environments is entirely reasonable... Not sure that they should be required
to report testing tools like aviewer, wave, etc... but certainly which
screen reader they used...

David MacDonald

CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities

-----Original Message-----
From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) [mailto:r.scano@webprofession.com] 
Sent: January-27-13 11:26 AM
To: 'Velleman, Eric'; public-wai-evaltf@w3.org; david100@sympatico.ca
Subject: R: Combining evaluations

Eric wrote:
WCAG-EM currently supports a large base like in WCAG. Maybe we should add
the requirement to add the tools, user-agents etc. that have been used in
the evaluation to the report and to the evaluation statement. 

I agree, we have done this one for italian government sites that
auto-evalutate themeself. This was a technical auto-evalutation conformance
model for WCAG 1.0 testing.

Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 16:11:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:23 UTC