W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2012

Re: EOWG Comments on 20 September 2012 Draft

From: Ramón Corominas <rcorominas@technosite.es>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:00:13 +0200
Message-ID: <508694DD.8020306@technosite.es>
To: shawn@w3.org
CC: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Hi all,

Just a quick comment to one of the EOWG comments:


"As part of EM, I would suggest that that we should make a strong case 
for planned reviews to maintain standards and avoid the effect of drift 
that has been observed by researchers. {Suzette}"

I totally agree, and it would be very helpful for certification schemes 
such as Euracert, that includes a set of reviews after the certification 
itself. In addition, these monitoring activities combine automated and 
manual reviews each 3 months during an initial period of 2 years 
(certification -> automated -> manual -> automated...).

Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 13:03:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:23 UTC