Hi all, it seems close to what I would prefer. Because of our long discussions and to avoid misunderstandings probably it needs further explanations on what it doesn't mean. Best Kerstin Am 02.06.2012 um 15:38 schrieb Aurélien Levy <aurelien.levy@temesis.com>: > Hi, > > as it's close enough to what I suggest in a previous mail I totally agree with these proposals. > > > Aurélien >> Hi Richard, >> >> Nice suggestion. Building this into your earlier suggestion… >> >> Does it mean 1.e becomes: >> >> Step 1.e: Defined the test procedures which will be used. >> Requirement 1.e: The test procedures that will be used to evaluate the conformance to WCAG 2.0 should be specified. >> >> And, to update 4b to become "Step 4.b: Use test procedures from WCAG 2.0 Techniques where possible". (following through 4.b with changes like 'using test procedures from…') >> >> If it does - you have my 100% backing. >> >> All the best >> >> Alistair >Received on Saturday, 2 June 2012 15:16:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:14 GMT