W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > January 2012

Re: metadata for evaluation methodology?

From: Michael S Elledge <elledge@msu.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:02:59 -0500
Message-ID: <4F0DCED3.4020205@msu.edu>
To: "Boland Jr, Frederick E." <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Tim--

Can you expand a bit on this? I don't think I understand. It seems to me 
that the required components of an evaluation would be the WCAG 2.0 
success criteria, but I'll bet that isn't what you meant.


On 1/11/2012 8:38 AM, Boland Jr, Frederick E. wrote:
> I'm worried that we don't seem to be compiling anywhere a list of 
> (required/optional) (terms/components) for an evaluation.  We're 
> having a lot of good discussion and document development, but I 
> couldn't find captured from that discussion anywhere some preliminary 
> metadata for evaluations, like was done for Test Metadata for old W3C 
> Quality Assurance Working Group and for old test samples development 
> task force.  Maybe it's too early yet, but at least we should be 
> brainstorming about such a list, at least for the template appendix?
> Just a thought..
> Thanks and best wishes
> Tim Boland NIST
> PS -- if such a list exists, then my apologies..
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 18:06:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:19 UTC