W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > January 2012

metadata for evaluation methodology?

From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:38:06 -0500
To: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930901015FDD@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
I'm worried that we don't seem to be compiling anywhere a list of (required/optional) (terms/components) for an evaluation.  We're having a lot of good discussion and document development, but I couldn't find captured from that discussion anywhere some preliminary metadata for evaluations, like was done for Test Metadata for old W3C Quality Assurance Working Group and for old test samples development task force.  Maybe it's too early yet, but at least we should be brainstorming about such a list, at least for the template appendix?

Just a thought..
Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

PS - if such a list exists, then my apologies..
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 13:41:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:19 UTC