W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > September 2011

possible structure for us to use in an accessibility evaluation document?

From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:53:48 -0400
To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308D3527004@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
As a possible structure for us to use when developing our requirements/best practices, etc, the format and layout of the Quality Assurance Framework: Specification Guidelines document:


may be useful.  This document has guidelines, requirements, good practices, a glossary, and a checklist at the end.  After the requirements/good practices there are some explanatory/rationale paragraphs, along with some techniques/examples, and related items.   I'm not referring to the content of this document, rather the way it is structured.   As we are developing our requirements/best practices for accessibility evaluation, perhaps we could employ parts of this structure or something like it if applicable and appropriate..?

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 13:54:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:18 UTC