Re: Short name for Methodology from Kerstin Probiesch on 2011-10-13 (public-wai-evaltf@w3.org from October 2011)

From: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:54:07 +0200
To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
Cc: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <623CAD25-5416-4CDB-B957-6A1BD53CCA04@gmail.com>

Hello TF,

I think WAEM is ok cause it's the title. 

Regs

Kerstin

Via Mobile

Am 13.10.2011 um 17:11 schrieb "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>:

> Dear all,
> 
> We decided in the call to discuss the short name in the list. Below are some short names from the discussions we had sofar and a proposed shortlist of requirements:
> 
> Requirements for a short name:
> - It should be short
> - Easy to pronounce
> - Clear to all what it means (selfexplanatory)
> - Be about the methodology
> 
> Shortnames (Make your choice or add new ones):
> - SiteAccess
> - WCAG-Method
> - WCAG-EM
> - WAEM (really using the title)
> - WCAG-Check
> - AccessSite
> - WCAG-Site
> - AccessCheck
> - SiteCheck
> - CheckSite
> - WAMBAM
> - WAME
> - MCEWA
> - CEWA
> - CEW2WCAG2
> - UWEM
> - SITE
> - MAWA
> - MDWC
> - EWAMAC
> - EMAWC
> - WEM
> 
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 15:54:32 UTC