W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Short name for Methodology

From: <kvotis@iti.gr>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:28:23 +0300
Message-ID: <64b058bdc98742fab3812188f0bf947f.squirrel@mail.iti.gr>
To: "Kerstin Probiesch" <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
Cc: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
i vote for WAEM


> Hello TF,
>
> I think WAEM is ok cause it's the title.
>
> Regs
>
> Kerstin
>
> Via Mobile
>
> Am 13.10.2011 um 17:11 schrieb "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> We decided in the call to discuss the short name in the list. Below are
>> some short names from the discussions we had sofar and a proposed
>> shortlist of requirements:
>>
>> Requirements for a short name:
>> - It should be short
>> - Easy to pronounce
>> - Clear to all what it means (selfexplanatory)
>> - Be about the methodology
>>
>> Shortnames (Make your choice or add new ones):
>> - SiteAccess
>> - WCAG-Method
>> - WCAG-EM
>> - WAEM (really using the title)
>> - WCAG-Check
>> - AccessSite
>> - WCAG-Site
>> - AccessCheck
>> - SiteCheck
>> - CheckSite
>> - WAMBAM
>> - WAME
>> - MCEWA
>> - CEWA
>> - CEW2WCAG2
>> - UWEM
>> - SITE
>> - MAWA
>> - MDWC
>> - EWAMAC
>> - EMAWC
>> - WEM
>>
>> Kindest regards,
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 06:29:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT