W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2011

Re: naming for "Methodology"

From: Elle <nethermind@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:45:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ=fddMWXNCbHD+Ph2San1UFyr0GttRKHY5Fw=ZDE_vH3Opwfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>
Cc: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Evaluation Methodology for Assessing Website Conformity to WCAG 2.0  is my
vote.

Cheers,
Elle



On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Denis Boudreau <
dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com> wrote:

> Or, based on the message from Amy I just saw, "Evaluation Methodology for
> Assessing Website Accessibility Conformity to WCAG 2.0".
>
> And that would make the acronym "EMAWAC"... which, as everyone knows, means
> "don't forget tool testing with real users" in Cherokee. ;p
>
> /Denis
>
>
> On 2011-10-07, at 1:17 AM, Denis Boudreau wrote:
>
> > Same for "MAWC for WCAG 2.0".
> >
> > But maybe I'd prefer "Evaluation Methodology for Assessing Website
> Conformity to WCAG 2.0".
> >
> > That would make the acronym "EMAWC". ;p
> >
> > /Denis
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2011-10-06, at 7:17 AM, Léonie Watson wrote:
> >
> >>      "Methodology for Assessing Website Conformity to WCAG 2.0" is
> clear, concise and usable. Gets my vote.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Léonie.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Nomensa - humanising technology
> >>
> >> Léonie Watson, Director of Accessibility & Web Development
> >>
> >> tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333
> >> twitter: @we_are_Nomensa @LeonieWatson
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [mailto:
> public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shadi Abou-Zahra
> >> Sent: 06 October 2011 06:18
> >> To: Eval TF
> >> Subject: naming for "Methodology"
> >>
> >> Dear group,
> >>
> >> As trivial as it may sound it is time for us to think about a name for
> the Methodology, so that we can start fleshing it out.
> >>
> >> Here are some brainstorms to get your creativity flowing:
> >>
> >>
> >> # Favorites:
> >> - Sampling, Inspection, and Technical Evaluation [of Websites for WCAG
> 2.0] (SITE) ... especially when used in combination like "WCAG 2.0 SITE"
> >> - Methodology for Assessing Website Conformity to WCAG 2.0 (MAC)
> >>
> >>
> >> # Alternatives:
> >> - Conformance Evaluation of Websites for Accessibility (CEWA or Conf)
> >> - Accessibility Conformance Evaluation of Websites (ACEW)
> >> - Conformance/Conformity Assessment Procedure (CAP)
> >> - Conformance/Conformity Assessment Methodology (CAM)
> >> - Website Accessibility Evaluation (WAE)
> >> - Website Accessibility Assessment (WAA)
> >> - Website Accessibility Methodology (WAM)
> >> - Website Accessibility Assessment Procedure (WAAP)
> >> - Website Accessibility Assessment Methodology (WAAM)
> >> - Website Accessibility Evaluation Procedure (WAEP)
> >> - Website Accessibility Evaluation Methodology (WAEM)
> >> - Website Accessibility Inspection Procedure (WAIP)
> >> - Website Accessibility Inspection Methodology (WAIM)
> >>
> >>
> >> # Not serious:
> >> - Conformance of Websites (CoW, WCAG-CoW, or WAI-CoW)
> >> - Accessibility Conformance of Websites (A-CoW)
> >> - Procedure for Accessibility Inspection (PAI like "pay")
> >> - Procedure for Evaluation of Accessibility (PEA)
> >> - Procedure for Evaluation of Accessibility Conformance (PEACe)
> >> - Accessibility Evaluation of Websites (AEW)
> >> - Harmonized Assessment Methodology (HAM)
> >> - WCAG 2.0 Harmonized Assessment Methodology (WHAM)
> >> - Website Conformance Assessment Guidelines (WCAG)
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>  Shadi
> >>
> >> --
> >> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
> >> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
> >> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
> >> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
If you want to build a ship, don't drum up the people to gather wood, divide
the work, and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and
endless sea.
- Antoine De Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 13:46:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT