Re: updated draft charter

Hi Samuel,

Thanks for the feedback.

Yes, good point about the ordering. I've removed it as there isn't 
really an explicit order.

Regards,
   Shadi


On 3.6.2013 15:17, "Samuel Martín" wrote:
> Hi Shadi, all,
>
> I mostly agree with the new charter, it basically acknowledges what we
> suggested during the discussions, and I especially reckon the addition of
> some new exploratory points.
>
> I have just a minor formal comment: I was wondering whether the first
> point in the scope was really the most relevant. Then I noticed they were
> not deemed to be ordered indeed. Thus I would suggest using a <ul> for the
> scope (I have just checked some other WGs do the same, although the old
> ERT charter did not).
>
> Regards,
>
> Samuel.
>
>> Hi Shadi,
>>
>> there are no comments from our side
>>
>> On 03/06/13 09:38, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>>> Dear group,
>>>
>>> Ref: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/charter5.html
>>>
>>> Please find an updated draft charter that should reflect our previous
>>> discussions on it. Please let me know by Wednesday if you have further
>>> comments or suggestions, or if you need more time to review it.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>     Shadi
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Saludos,
>> carlos
>>
>> Dr Carlos A Velasco
>>     Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT
>>     Web Compliance Center: http://imergo.com/ ˇ http://imergo.de/
>>     Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
>>     Tel: +49-2241-142609 ˇ Fax: +49-2241-1442609
>>
>
>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)

Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 22:39:27 UTC