W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > March 2009

Re: [updated] EARL 1.0 Schema (v 9 March 2009)

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:26:01 +0100
Message-ID: <49B7ADD9.3030305@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb:

> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090309>
[...]
> Please send your thoughts and comments to the list, in preparation for 
> the teleconference call.


<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090309#producers>:

> 2. A Producer must generate reports in RDF/XML serializations and should also support other RDF serializations

A producer may be configured to create a report in N3 syntax. So I think 
we should require a conforming producer to "be able to generate reports 
in RDF/XML serializations". However this wording may also be ambiguous.



<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090309#consumers>:

> 2. A Consumer must process reports in RDF/XML serialization and should also support other RDF serializations

As suggested during last phone call: "process reports in any RDF/XML 
serialization".



<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090309#partial>:

Editorial:

> Example 12: An Web accessibility evaluation tool

-> A Web accessibility evaluation tool

> Example 15: An quality assurance tool

-> A quality assurance tool



<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090309#terms>:

I thought we agreed that earl:Automatic, earl:Pass etc. are not 
_instances_ but _subclasses_ of earl:TestMode/earl:OutcomeValue.

-- 
Johannes Koch
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT
Web Compliance Center
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 12:26:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 11 March 2009 12:26:38 GMT