W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Minor updates to requirements document

From: Michael A Squillace <masquill@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:41:16 -0500
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFD1E8A3C1.1CEC8BAB-ON852575DE.004AED4D-862575DE.004B31E7@us.ibm.com>

> EARL 1.0 Schema. Is it the schema document (the core) for the 1.0
> version of EARL? Or the 1.0 version of EARL Schema?
It's the version of the entire suite of vocabularies. The requirements
document applies to the vocabulary, which we agreed was defined over
multiple specs.

> Do we also want to version e.g. Content-in-RDF?
> What if Content-in-RDF gets a new version number, say 1.1. Would that
> make EARL the vocabulary version 1.1, even if EARL Schema is not changed?
Good point. My own view is that all of the documents should be versioned
and that, when one changes, the version of the suite changes. The suite is
not defined entirely in terms of the core vocabulary (i.e. the schema) nor
should the version be defined in that way.
--> Mike Squillace
IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center

W:512.286.8694
M:512.970.0066

External: http://www.ibm.com/able
Internal: http://w3.ibm.com/able


                                                                           
             Johannes Koch                                                 
             <johannes.koch@fi                                             
             t.fraunhofer.de>                                           To 
             Sent by:                  ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>      
             public-wai-ert-re                                          cc 
             quest@w3.org                                                  
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: Minor updates to requirements   
             06/23/2009 08:31          document                            
             AM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Michael A Squillace schrieb:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Requirements-20090526
>
> Please let me know if you have questions or concerns.

> This document describes the requirements for the scope, design, and
features of the Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0

About versioning:

EARL 1.0 Schema. Is it the schema document (the core) for the 1.0
version of EARL? Or the 1.0 version of EARL Schema?

Do we also want to version e.g. Content-in-RDF?

What if Content-in-RDF gets a new version number, say 1.1. Would that
make EARL the vocabulary version 1.1, even if EARL Schema is not changed?

--
Johannes Koch
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT
Web Compliance Center
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065






graycol.gif
(image/gif attachment: graycol.gif)

pic11436.gif
(image/gif attachment: pic11436.gif)

ecblank.gif
(image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif)

Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 13:42:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 June 2009 13:42:05 GMT