W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > June 2009

Re: [ACTION-99] Use OWL Ontology headers in the Schema of all our documents (reworded)

From: Carlos A Velasco <carlos.velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:16:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4A38DE83.9090801@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Cc: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Shadi,

Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> Thank you for this suggestion. I've incorporated it except for the
> owl:imports. According to the OWL specification, it says:
> 
> - "An owl:imports statement references another OWL ontology containing
> definitions, whose meaning is considered to be part of the meaning of
> the importing ontology."
> 
> I'm not sure that we actually want to *import* other namespaces. This
> relates to Notes 5&6 about requiring support for HTTP-in-RDF and for
> Content-in-RDF:

I think we should. I think we are using the meaning of the other
vocabularies.

regards,
carlos

-- 
Dr Carlos A Velasco
  Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT
  Web Compliance Center: http://webcc.fit.fraunhofer.de/
  imergo®: http://imergo.com/ · http://imergo.de/
  Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
  Tel: +49-2241-142609 · Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 12:16:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 17 June 2009 12:16:37 GMT