W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > June 2009

Re: [ACTION-99] Use OWL Ontology headers in the Schema of all our documents (reworded)

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:20:08 +0200
Message-ID: <4A41E1B8.5000909@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb:
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> Thank you for this suggestion. I've incorporated it except for the 
> owl:imports. According to the OWL specification, it says:
> 
> - "An owl:imports statement references another OWL ontology containing 
> definitions, whose meaning is considered to be part of the meaning of 
> the importing ontology."
> 
> I'm not sure that we actually want to *import* other namespaces. This 
> relates to Notes 5&6 about requiring support for HTTP-in-RDF and for 
> Content-in-RDF:
>  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090610#note5>
>  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090610#note6>
> 
> Once we have a resolution on these points then we can update the RDF 
> accordingly. For now, I've added rdfs:seeAlso for cross-referencing.

Can we add the imports and ask for comments by OWL people on that?

-- 
Johannes Koch
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT
Web Compliance Center
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 08:20:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 June 2009 08:20:45 GMT