- From: Carlos A Velasco <carlos.velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:16:03 +0200
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Shadi, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > Thank you for this suggestion. I've incorporated it except for the > owl:imports. According to the OWL specification, it says: > > - "An owl:imports statement references another OWL ontology containing > definitions, whose meaning is considered to be part of the meaning of > the importing ontology." > > I'm not sure that we actually want to *import* other namespaces. This > relates to Notes 5&6 about requiring support for HTTP-in-RDF and for > Content-in-RDF: I think we should. I think we are using the meaning of the other vocabularies. regards, carlos -- Dr Carlos A Velasco Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT Web Compliance Center: http://webcc.fit.fraunhofer.de/ imergo®: http://imergo.com/ · http://imergo.de/ Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 · Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 12:16:37 UTC