- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:57:02 +0200
- To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- CC: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Thank you! We should agree on this during today's call, and include this in our "document alignment" collection for all specs to follow. Best, Shadi Carlos Iglesias wrote: >> As per my action item I've checked with Ivan and got >> confirmation that adding OWL constructs is a good idea. He adds: >> >>> B.t.w, this is actually the core of what the new OWL group calls >>> Profiles, especially OWL RL profiles: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#OWL_2_RL >>> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#Reasoning_in_OWL_2_RL_and_RDF_Grap >>> hs_using_Rules >> CarlosI, would be great if you could get suggestions from Diego. > > I have checked with Diego and he told me that the main thing it to declare the classes as rdfs:Class and owl:Class instances. In RDF/XML we can use <rdf:type>, for example: > > <rdfs:Class rdf:about="...."> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class"/> > <!-- ... --> > </rdfs:Class> > > Which is the abbreviated for: > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="..."> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class"/> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Class"/> > </rdf:Description> > > Simmilary, he also suggests to declare the properties as owl:DatatypeProperty or owl:ObjectProperty, apart from rdf:Property. > > Regards, > CI. > > ____________________ > > Carlos Iglesias > > Fundación CTIC > Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón > 33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España > teléfono: +34 984291212 > email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org > URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 10:57:14 UTC