- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:12:59 +0100
- To: Carlos A Velasco <carlos.velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Carlos, This is helpful background. Could you also provide an outline of some of the classes and/or properties that you propose we adopt? I don't think an earl:project property is useful as would seem out of context. It may be better to think of a DOAP project as a test subject and see how it would fit into the EARL 1.0 Schema. I guess any DOAP project must have a title or some kind of handle/identifier? Cheers, Shadi Carlos A Velasco wrote: > Hi Shadi, > > Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: >> Hi Carlos, >> >> Thank you for doing this research over the weekend! Could you share a >> summary of your research outcome with regard to the stability and the >> deployment of DOAP? > > DOAP is widely spread on some Open Source projects: Apache Foundation, > Codehaus, Sourceforge, etc. However, I could not find any commercial > tool using it. I think it makes sense, despite this, to offer the chance > to describe the Software with this optional property. I can contact Edd > Dumbill to ask him about the stability of the thing. > >> Also, please do not add any properties to the schema until there is an >> according resolution by the group to adopt such a property. > > Oops. I will update the Schema later today with Johannes' comments too. > > regards, > carlos > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 20:13:43 UTC