W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Content-in-RDF stable draft

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:22:09 +0100
Message-ID: <47DEEF11.1090707@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Cc: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, public-wai-ert@w3.org

Carlos Iglesias schrieb:
>>> I just looked at the XML 1.0 spec (<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/>). The
>>> relevant terminology there is:
>>>
>>> XML spec                    DOM spec
>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>> XMLDecl
>>> VersionNum                  xmlVersion
>>> EncName                     xmlEncoding
>>> (SDDecl)                    xmlStandalone
>>> doctypedecl                 doctype / DocumentType
>>> Name                        name
>>> PubidLiteral                publicId
>>> SystemLiteral               systemId
>>> intSubset                   internalSubset
>>>
>>> I think the DOM approach is more what we want. We also have types and
>>> properties. However, I don't like calling the property for the document
>>> type name just "name".
>> I agree with using the DOM approach, the terms seem more expressive. I
>> also agree with the "name"-issue. Maybe use "doctypename" instead?
> 
> +1 for the DOM approach and the "doctypeName" option.

So it'll be more or less the same as in the current draft :-)

-- 
Johannes Koch
BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 22:22:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 17 March 2008 22:22:54 GMT