W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > March 2008

RE: Content-in-RDF stable draft

From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:40:07 +0100
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA5218828190320DE6E@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>


Hi,

> > I just looked at the XML 1.0 spec (<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/>). The
> > relevant terminology there is:
> >
> > XML spec                    DOM spec
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > XMLDecl
> > VersionNum                  xmlVersion
> > EncName                     xmlEncoding
> > (SDDecl)                    xmlStandalone
> > doctypedecl                 doctype / DocumentType
> > Name                        name
> > PubidLiteral                publicId
> > SystemLiteral               systemId
> > intSubset                   internalSubset
> >
> > I think the DOM approach is more what we want. We also have types and
> > properties. However, I don't like calling the property for the document
> > type name just "name".
> 
> I agree with using the DOM approach, the terms seem more expressive. I
> also agree with the "name"-issue. Maybe use "doctypename" instead?


+1 for the DOM approach and the "doctypeName" option.


Regards,
 CI.

__________________


Carlos Iglesias

Fundación CTIC
Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón
33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España

teléfono: +34 984291212
fax: +34 984390612
email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 17:40:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 17 March 2008 17:40:30 GMT