W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > September 2007

Re: replacing earl:inferred with aggregation logic (Issue #7a)

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:04:06 +0200
Message-ID: <46DEC566.1070503@w3.org>
To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
CC: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Carlos Iglesias wrote:
>> #3. for all other test mode combinations of sub-tests, the test mode of
>> the combined test is "semi-automatic".
>  
> I think this doesn't work with the current definition of semi-automatic, 
> specially with the "...a software tool was primarily responsible..." 
>  
> If I have an automatic one and a manual one, why the result of the 
> combination must be mainly guided by a software tool?

We have agreed on this new definitions for the term semi-automatic:

- earl:semiAutomatic
Where the test was partially carried out by the software tool, but where
human input or judgment was still required to decide or help decide the
outcome of the test.

See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jul/0019

Does this work better now?


Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 15:04:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT