W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Antw: RE: replacing earl:inferred with aggregation logic (Issue #7a)

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:14:11 +0200
Message-ID: <46DEC7C3.90407@w3.org>
To: Reinhard Ruemer <Reinhard.Ruemer@jku.at>
CC: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Reinhard Ruemer wrote:
>>> #3. for all other test mode combinations of sub-tests, the test mode of
>>> the combined test is "semi-automatic".
> 
> I also think semi-automatic is misleading. But why not define a mode called "mixed". This would suggest, that the test mode has been all (or at least two) of: automatic, semi-automatic, and/or manual?

"mixed" is quite ambiguous and we worked hard to get rid of it (it 
became "notAvailable" which then became "undisclosed"). Maybe there are 
some situations where it makes sense to leave out the test mode to 
indicate that it is not known (or can not be aggregated)?

Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 15:14:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT