W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Scheleton for Content-in-RDF

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:47:46 +0100
Message-ID: <4731EC32.5010803@w3.org>
To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
CC: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi,

Johannes Koch wrote:
> 
> Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for doing this Johannes. Just a minor comment from a quick skim 
>> of the document, I appreciate the alphabetic order
> 
> I did this intentionally in the RDF schema (Appendix A1) and the tables 
> (Appendix C).

Any specific reason for this decision?


>> but think there is a hierarchy that would make the document easier to 
>> understand if it is reflected appropriately.
> 
> I agree, sections 2.5 and 2.6 could be made sections 2.4.1 and 2.4.2.

Yes, I think that would help readers.


> There could also be a similar reason to make sections 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 
> subsections of 2.1 :-)

Very similar reason, yes... ;)


Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 16:47:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:29 GMT