- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:07:41 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: > > Hi, > > Johannes Koch wrote: >> >> Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for doing this Johannes. Just a minor comment from a quick >>> skim of the document, I appreciate the alphabetic order >> >> I did this intentionally in the RDF schema (Appendix A1) and the >> tables (Appendix C). > > Any specific reason for this decision? Alphabetic order may help some people find the classes/properties. Others may think hierarchically and will therefore profit from a hierarchical document structure. >>> but think there is a hierarchy that would make the document easier to >>> understand if it is reflected appropriately. >> >> I agree, sections 2.5 and 2.6 could be made sections 2.4.1 and 2.4.2. > > Yes, I think that would help readers. > > >> There could also be a similar reason to make sections 2.2, 2.3, and >> 2.4 subsections of 2.1 :-) > > Very similar reason, yes... ;) Should I interpret your smiley as an irony indicator? -- Johannes Koch BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Friday, 9 November 2007 09:08:58 UTC