W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Scheleton for Content-in-RDF

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:07:41 +0100
Message-ID: <4734235D.9080903@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Johannes Koch wrote:
>>
>> Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for doing this Johannes. Just a minor comment from a quick 
>>> skim of the document, I appreciate the alphabetic order
>>
>> I did this intentionally in the RDF schema (Appendix A1) and the 
>> tables (Appendix C).
> 
> Any specific reason for this decision?

Alphabetic order may help some people find the classes/properties. 
Others may think hierarchically and will therefore profit from a 
hierarchical document structure.

>>> but think there is a hierarchy that would make the document easier to 
>>> understand if it is reflected appropriately.
>>
>> I agree, sections 2.5 and 2.6 could be made sections 2.4.1 and 2.4.2.
> 
> Yes, I think that would help readers.
> 
> 
>> There could also be a similar reason to make sections 2.2, 2.3, and 
>> 2.4 subsections of 2.1 :-)
> 
> Very similar reason, yes... ;)

Should I interpret your smiley as an irony indicator?

-- 
Johannes Koch
BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Friday, 9 November 2007 09:08:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:29 GMT