W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > July 2007

[Fwd: [Fwd: Re: [Use Cases and Requirements] comment]]

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:33:29 +0200
Message-ID: <468DFE59.6080608@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org

FYI

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: [Fwd: Re: [Use Cases and Requirements] comment]
Datum: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:24:38 +0100
Von: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Organisation: FOSI
An: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>

I got bumped out of the ERT list (even the public one) so I should have
copied you in directly to this.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Use Cases and Requirements] comment
Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:19:48 +0000
Resent-From: public-powderwg@w3.org
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:19:30 +0100
From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Organization: FOSI
To: public-powderwg@w3.org,  public-wai-ert@w3.org
References: <468D0899.5000909@fit.fraunhofer.de>


Hi Johannes,

The intention behind requirement 3.2.4 has always been to make sure that
POWDER and EARL work together - i.e. that the realisation of this
requirement would be a predicate that pointed to an EARL result that
supported the claims made in the Description Resource.

We're discussing the use cases doc at our face to face meeting next week
and will certainly consider adding something like "such as an EARL test
result" - but the argument against is that the use cases don't refer to
any specific technologies as solutions, only in the context of adding
DRs to existing technologies where appropriate.

Thanks again for taking the time to review our work to date, it is
deeply appreciated.

Phil

Johannes Koch wrote:
> 
> Hi POWDER group,
> 
> I had a short look at the "Use Cases and Requirements" document 
> (<http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-powder-use-cases-20070525/>) with an 
> ERT group member's eye and thought you may think about mentioning EARL 
> in section "3.2.4 Link to Test Results".
> 

-- 
Phil Archer
Chief Technical Officer,
Family Online Safety Institute
w. http://www.fosi.org/people/philarcher/

Already labelled with ICRA? It's time to raise the bar on child
protection standards by ensuring your site is ICRAchecked.
See http://checked.icra.org/ for more info.



-- 
Johannes Koch
BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 08:33:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT