W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > July 2007

Re: [Use Cases and Requirements] comment

From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:19:46 +0000
Message-ID: <468DFB12.10109@icra.org>
To: public-powderwg@w3.org, public-wai-ert@w3.org




Hi Johannes,

The intention behind requirement 3.2.4 has always been to make sure that 
POWDER and EARL work together - i.e. that the realisation of this 
requirement would be a predicate that pointed to an EARL result that 
supported the claims made in the Description Resource.

We're discussing the use cases doc at our face to face meeting next week 
and will certainly consider adding something like "such as an EARL test 
result" - but the argument against is that the use cases don't refer to 
any specific technologies as solutions, only in the context of adding 
DRs to existing technologies where appropriate.

Thanks again for taking the time to review our work to date, it is 
deeply appreciated.

Phil

Johannes Koch wrote:
> 
> Hi POWDER group,
> 
> I had a short look at the "Use Cases and Requirements" document 
> (<http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-powder-use-cases-20070525/>) with an 
> ERT group member's eye and thought you may think about mentioning EARL 
> in section "3.2.4 Link to Test Results".
> 

-- 
Phil Archer
Chief Technical Officer,
Family Online Safety Institute
w. http://www.fosi.org/people/philarcher/

Already labelled with ICRA? It's time to raise the bar on child 
protection standards by ensuring your site is ICRAchecked.
See http://checked.icra.org/ for more info.
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 12:21:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT