- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:48:40 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > RDF itself provides this, by pointing to a resource. If you want to use > dc:foo or some other form of identification there is nothing to stop > you, but I don't think they should be mandatory. This brings me to a thought about WebContent, is it possible to use rdf:about rather than defining a uri:uri for this purpose? Here is an example of what I'm thinking of: <earl:WebContent rdf:about="http://www.exmaple.org/some/thing"> <!--// optional HTTP stuff to describe the resource //--> </earl:WebContent> <earl:Assertion rdf:ID="xyz"> <earl:subject rdf:resource="http://www.exmaple.org/some/thing"/> <!--// the other assertion properties //--> </earl:Assertion> Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 08:48:50 UTC