W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > July 2006

Re: Action Item: Testable Statement class

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:47:42 +0200
Message-ID: <44C9EB4E.2010007@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: ERT group <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

[TestRequirement and TestCase subclasses of Testable]

> I still think this is a bad idea, since I don't see the value in having  
> the two kinds of subClass. If we adopt this, the range of 
> earl:requirement  needs to be made earl:Testable too. (Since we are 
> shifting the range to a  superclass, I think we can get away with that.

If the object for the earl:testable is either an earl:TestRequirement or 
an earl:TestCase we can create both assertions about subjects 
passing/failing/... a certain test case or meeting/not meeting certain 
Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Friday, 28 July 2006 10:47:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:54 UTC